Quick Comparison
For most budget-conscious solo hikers, the Lanshan 1 offers the lower-cost route to a double-wall trekking-pole tent. It lists a minimum weight of 740 g, a packed size of approximately 32 × 14 × 14 cm, and a price of approximately €108. The Durston X-Mid 1 is a more expensive double-wall trekking-pole tent with a listed weight of 745 g and a design focused on spaciousness, simple pitching, and refined details. Its current product page describes a third-generation model with 2026 zipper and floor-fabric updates. The two tents are close in listed minimum weight, but they are not identical systems. The Lanshan 1 costs substantially less and offers mesh or solid inner configurations. The X-Mid 1 provides two vestibules, a diagonal floor layout, and a four-stake pitch. Choose Lanshan 1 for price and compact value; choose X-Mid 1 for a more refined setup and larger usable living space.
| Feature | Lanshan 1 | Durston X-Mid 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 1 person | 1 person |
| Construction | Double-wall trekking-pole tent | Double-wall trekking-pole tent |
| Listed minimum weight | 740 g | 745 g |
| Packed/carried weight | Not separately published | Confirm current configuration; higher than listed minimum |
| Listed packed size | Approximately 32 × 14 × 14 cm | Check current product configuration |
| Support system | 1 trekking pole | 2 trekking poles |
| Recommended pole length | Approximately 120–125 cm | Poles can be extended without a fixed measurement |
| Inner tent | Mesh or solid-fabric option | Mesh inner |
| Entrances | 1 | 2 |
| Vestibules | 1 | 2 |
| Seam treatment | Factory taped | Factory waterproofed |
| Current version | Updated 2026 version | Third-generation model with 2026 upgrades |
| Approximate price | €108 | Approximately HK$1,992 on the current regional listing |
| Best for | Budget-conscious solo hikers | Hikers prioritizing space and setup refinement |
| Not ideal for | Freestanding-tent users or wide-pad users without checking dimensions | Buyers with a strict low-cost budget |
The weights shown are manufacturer-listed minimum or stated weights. They should not be treated as directly equivalent packed or carried weights.
Weight and Packability
The Lanshan 1 and X-Mid 1 are unusually close in published weight, but the number alone does not describe the complete shelter system.
Lanshan 1 weight
The Lanshan 1 lists a minimum weight of 740 g. The manufacturer lists a packed size of approximately 32 × 14 × 14 cm.
The product page does not provide a separate packed or carried-weight figure. The final weight in your backpack will be higher after adding:
- Stakes
- Guylines
- Stuff sacks
- Repair materials
- Optional footprint
- Trekking pole or dedicated support pole
The Lanshan 1 uses one trekking pole adjusted to approximately 120–125 cm. If you already carry that pole for hiking, it does not need to be counted as an additional tent-only item. If you need to purchase a dedicated support pole, include its weight and price in the complete comparison.
X-Mid 1 weight
The current Durston product page lists the X-Mid 1 at 745 g. It describes the current model as a third-generation design and notes 2026 upgrades to the zipper and floor fabric.
The X-Mid 1 also uses trekking poles, but its geometry uses two poles rather than one. The poles can be extended without measuring a fixed 120–125 cm length in the same way as the Lanshan system.
The X-Mid’s published weight should also be treated carefully. A carried setup may include the tent, inner, stuff sacks, stakes, guylines, and trekking poles. Verify the exact current regional specification before comparing it with another manufacturer’s minimum figure.
Which is lighter?
Based on current listed figures, the Lanshan 1 is 5 g lighter than the X-Mid 1:
- Lanshan 1: 740 g minimum weight
- X-Mid 1: 745 g listed weight
That difference is too small to determine the buying decision by itself. The two products may use different weighing methods, configurations, and included components.
For practical gear planning, compare the complete carried systems. Consider whether you will carry one or two trekking poles, which stakes you use, whether you add a footprint, and whether the Lanshan configuration includes a mesh or solid inner.
Packability
The Lanshan 1 has a clearly stated packed size of approximately 32 × 14 × 14 cm. This is compact and easy to fit into a backpack.
The X-Mid 1’s final packed volume depends on the current configuration and how the tent is divided between the fly, inner, stakes, and bags. Its two-pole structure can also affect how the complete system is stored, although the tent itself remains suitable for backpacking.
Best for
The Lanshan 1 is best for hikers who want:
- A low-cost double-wall shelter
- A compact solo tent
- One-pole support
- A simple and relatively light gear list
- The option of mesh or solid inner configurations
The X-Mid 1 is best for hikers who want:
- A spacious double-wall layout
- Two doors and two vestibules
- A simple four-stake pitch
- A more refined trekking-pole shelter system
Space and Livability
The largest practical difference between the two tents is not published minimum weight. It is how the available space is arranged and accessed.
Lanshan 1 interior
The Lanshan 1 is a compact one-person tent designed to reduce weight and packed volume. It has one entrance and one vestibule.
The single entrance keeps the structure relatively simple, but all entry and gear organization take place on the same side. A backpack and footwear can be stored in the vestibule, while the sleeping area is reserved for the occupant.
The standard Lanshan 1 is available with different inner configurations. A mesh inner can make the interior feel more open and improve airflow. A solid inner provides a more enclosed environment and can block more drafts.
Before purchasing, compare the floor dimensions with your sleeping pad. A standard-width pad is more likely to fit comfortably than a wide pad, and tall hikers should consider the angle of the end walls as well as the nominal floor length.
X-Mid 1 interior
The X-Mid 1 uses a diagonal floor and ridgeline arrangement. According to the current product information, it provides a floor approximately 93 inches long and 33 inches wide, with dual vestibules.
The diagonal geometry positions the two trekking poles away from the center of the sleeping area. This can provide more usable headroom and reduce interference when sitting up or changing clothes.
The two vestibules also provide more flexible storage. A backpack and footwear can be stored on one side, while the second side remains available for entry, cooking organization outside the inner, or additional gear.
The listed dimensions make the X-Mid 1 a strong option for taller hikers or users who want more living space from a one-person tent. Actual comfort still depends on sleeping-pad width, sleeping-bag loft, body size, and how the tent is pitched.
Doors and vestibules
The Lanshan 1 has one main entrance and one vestibule. This is adequate for solo use, but the user must enter and exit through the same side.
The X-Mid 1 has two doors and two vestibules. This makes it easier to choose the sheltered side for entry, improve airflow, and organize gear.
Two vestibules do not necessarily mean that the entire tent is larger in every direction. They do, however, make the space more versatile and reduce the amount of gear that needs to remain inside the inner tent.
Which has more space?
The X-Mid 1 generally offers more usable solo space, particularly for tall hikers or people who value two vestibules and two doors.
The Lanshan 1 is more compact and may be sufficient for users with standard-width sleeping equipment who spend limited time inside the tent during the day.
The comparison therefore depends on the type of space you value:
- Lower cost and compact shelter → Lanshan 1
- More headroom and storage flexibility → X-Mid 1
- One entrance and one vestibule → Lanshan 1
- Two entrances and two vestibules → X-Mid 1
Double-Wall Design and Condensation
Both tents use a double-wall design, which makes this comparison more balanced than a standard Lanshan versus Pro comparison.
How double-wall construction helps
A double-wall tent places a separate inner tent between the occupant and the outer rainfly. Moisture can still condense on the fly, but the inner creates a buffer that reduces direct contact with sleeping bags and clothing.
Neither shelter completely prevents condensation. Moisture levels depend on:
- Humidity
- Temperature differences
- Number of occupants
- Wet clothing and gear
- Ground moisture
- Campsite location
- Ventilation
- Fly tension
Lanshan 1 condensation management
The Lanshan 1 offers a mesh or solid inner configuration.
The mesh inner generally allows more airflow and is suitable for warmer conditions. It can also make the interior feel less enclosed. The solid inner blocks more drafts but may restrict airflow compared with mesh.
The Lanshan 1 has one vestibule and one main entrance. Keeping the door and available vents open when weather permits can improve air exchange.
The outer fly’s curved lower edge is intended to maintain airflow around the shelter. Good pitching remains important: a loose fly or blocked vent can increase moisture accumulation.
X-Mid 1 condensation management
The X-Mid 1 uses a full double-wall design with a mesh inner and two vestibules. Its two-door configuration allows more options for cross-ventilation.
The fly includes adjustable vents, and the polyester fly fabric is designed not to absorb water and sag in the same way as nylon. A stable pitch can help preserve the intended gap between fly and inner.
The X-Mid 1 may be easier to ventilate because it has two entrances and two vestibules. However, opening a door in rain can allow water into the vestibule or inner depending on wind direction and pitch.
Which has less condensation?
There is no reliable basis for claiming that one tent always produces less condensation. Both are double-wall designs, and both depend on ventilation and campsite selection.
The X-Mid 1 offers more ventilation options through its two doors and adjustable vents. The Lanshan 1 offers a mesh inner option and a simpler one-person layout.
For humid conditions, select the mesh inner for the Lanshan 1, keep vents open, avoid depressions and wet ground, and allow air to circulate around the fly.
Setup
The Lanshan 1 and X-Mid 1 both require trekking poles and secure stakes, but their pitching methods differ.
Lanshan 1 setup
The Lanshan 1 uses one trekking pole adjusted to approximately 120–125 cm. The setup requires correct placement of the corners, vestibule point, and additional guylines.
The manufacturer’s setup instructions specify establishing the corner points first, then placing the pole and additional anchor points. The ridge seam should be aligned correctly, and the fly should be tensioned evenly.
The single-pole system is straightforward once practiced, but an inaccurate pitch can reduce headroom or cause the fly to contact the inner tent.
X-Mid 1 setup
The X-Mid 1 is designed around a four-stake pitch. The current product page states that it does not require mandatory guylines for the basic setup, odd angles, or precise pole-height measurement.
The two poles are placed at offset points along the diagonal geometry. The design aims to provide a repeatable pitch with a rectangular base and predictable tension.
The X-Mid 1’s fly-first pitching method can also be useful in rain because the inner tent can remain protected while the outer structure is erected. Users should still practice the complete setup before relying on it in bad weather.
Which is easier?
The X-Mid 1 is likely to feel easier for users who prefer a repeatable four-stake pitch and adjustable trekking poles without a fixed length.
The Lanshan 1 has a simple one-pole structure and fewer structural poles to carry, but it requires more attention to stake placement and the recommended pole height.
Neither tent is automatically easy without practice. Both depend on suitable ground and secure anchors.
Weather Protection
Both tents are designed as lightweight trekking-pole shelters, but their weather protection comes from different details.
Lanshan 1
The Lanshan 1 uses a coated nylon rainfly and bathtub-style floor. The product page lists:
- 15D nylon rainfly
- Silicone/PU coating
- 5,000 mm listed rainfly waterproof rating
- 20D nylon floor
- 6,000 mm listed floor waterproof rating
- Factory-taped seams
The factory-taped seams reduce preparation before use. The 2026 version also replaces the earlier zipper and storm-flap arrangement with a waterproof zipper, uses metal hooks, and strengthens the ventilation-area fabric.
The shelter still needs to be pitched correctly. Water can enter through open doors, poor orientation, splashback, or water flowing beneath the floor.
X-Mid 1
The current X-Mid 1 product page describes full fly coverage, factory-waterproofed seams, adjustable vents, protected entrances, and a polyester fly designed to maintain its pitch when wet.
The current product is described as a third-generation model with 2026 updates to the zipper and floor fabric. These updates should be distinguished from older X-Mid specifications when comparing reviews or second-hand listings.
The X-Mid’s two vestibules and protected doorways provide more flexibility in rain. However, the tent remains a trekking-pole design and needs secure stakes.
Wind
Wind resistance depends on shelter geometry, orientation, guylines, stake quality, ground conditions, and pitch tension. A more expensive tent is not automatically safer in every wind condition.
The X-Mid 1’s offset geometry and multiple guy-out points are designed to distribute tension efficiently. The Lanshan 1 can also provide effective shelter when properly pitched and anchored.
Neither should be described as suitable for every storm, winter condition, or alpine environment without examining the specific forecast and route.
Which is better in rain?
The X-Mid 1 offers more refined rain-use features, including a fly-first setup, protected entrances, full fly coverage, and factory-waterproofed seams.
The Lanshan 1 also provides a coated rainfly, bathtub floor, factory-taped seams, and a waterproof zipper on the current 2026 version. It offers substantial rain protection at a much lower purchase price.
For occasional rain and normal backpacking, either may be suitable when correctly pitched. The X-Mid 1 is more convenient during wet setup, while the Lanshan 1 is more cost-efficient.
Price and Value
The Lanshan 1’s listed price is approximately €108. This makes it substantially less expensive than the Durston X-Mid 1, whose current regional product page lists approximately HK$1,992.
Currency, tax, shipping, promotions, and regional pricing can change the final amount. The comparison should therefore use the current checkout price for your location.
The Lanshan 1’s lower price comes with a simpler layout: one entrance, one vestibule, one trekking pole, and a compact floor plan. It still provides double-wall construction and factory-taped seams.
The X-Mid 1 costs more but adds:
- Two doors
- Two vestibules
- Larger listed floor dimensions
- Offset-pole geometry
- Four-stake setup
- Fly-first pitching
- Adjustable ventilation
- Current 2026 zipper and floor updates
The X-Mid 1 may therefore provide more value for hikers who use their tent frequently, spend more time inside during rain, or want a more spacious solo shelter.
The Lanshan 1 may provide better value for users who primarily want an affordable, lightweight, double-wall tent and are willing to accept a smaller, simpler design.
Who Should Buy Lanshan 1?
Buy the Lanshan 1 if you want:
- A low-cost double-wall trekking-pole tent
- A listed minimum weight of 740 g
- A compact packed size
- One-pole support
- Factory-taped seams
- Mesh or solid inner options
- A practical shelter for solo backpacking
It is especially suitable for beginners who want to learn trekking-pole camping without paying premium-tent prices.
It is not ideal for:
- Users who need a freestanding tent
- Hikers who prefer two entrances
- People using wide sleeping pads without checking dimensions
- Campers who regularly spend long periods inside during bad weather
- Technical winter or mountaineering use without confirming suitability
Who Should Buy X-Mid 1?
Buy the X-Mid 1 if you want:
- A spacious one-person double-wall shelter
- Two doors and two vestibules
- A larger listed floor area
- A repeatable four-stake pitch
- Fly-first setup in wet weather
- More refined ventilation and access options
- The current third-generation model with 2026 updates
It is particularly suitable for experienced backpackers, taller hikers, and users who value everyday livability over the lowest purchase price.
It is not ideal for:
- Buyers with a strict budget
- Users who do not carry trekking poles
- Campers who need a freestanding tent
- Hikers who only want the lightest possible shelter by the smallest margin
- Users who do not need additional doors, vestibules, or interior space
Final Verdict
The Lanshan 1 and Durston X-Mid 1 are close in listed weight but target different buyers.
Choose the Lanshan 1 for its lower price, compact pack size, one-pole design, and double-wall construction. It is a sensible option for budget-conscious solo backpackers and beginners.
Choose the X-Mid 1 if you are willing to pay more for a larger and more flexible interior, two vestibules, two doors, a repeatable four-stake pitch, and more refined wet-weather setup features.
The Lanshan 1 is not simply a cheaper X-Mid 1, and the X-Mid 1 is not automatically a better choice for every hiker. If cost is the primary constraint, the Lanshan 1 offers the clearer value. If livability and setup refinement matter more than price, the X-Mid 1 is the stronger fit.
For additional comparisons, read How to Choose a Lanshan Tent, Lanshan 1 vs Lanshan 1 Pro, and Best Ultralight 1-Person Tents.
FAQ
Is Lanshan 1 better than X-Mid 1?
The Lanshan 1 is better for buyers who prioritize low price, compact packing, and a simple double-wall trekking-pole tent. The X-Mid 1 is better for users who want more space, two vestibules, two doors, and a more refined setup system.
Is X-Mid 1 worth the extra money?
It can be worth the extra money if you value its larger listed interior, two-door layout, dual vestibules, four-stake pitch, fly-first setup, and 2026 updates. If you mainly want an affordable shelter with low weight, the Lanshan 1 may be sufficient.
Which is lighter?
The Lanshan 1 lists a minimum weight of 740 g, while the current X-Mid 1 lists 745 g. The Lanshan 1 is 5 g lighter on the published figures, but the difference is too small to determine the choice. Compare complete packed or carried systems, not minimum figures alone.
Which has more space?
The X-Mid 1 generally has more usable solo space. Its current listed floor is approximately 93 inches long and 33 inches wide, with two vestibules. The Lanshan 1 is more compact and has one entrance and one vestibule. Check the current dimensions if you use a wide sleeping pad or are taller than average.
Which is better in rain?
The X-Mid 1 offers a more refined wet-weather setup, including fly-first pitching, protected entrances, full fly coverage, and factory-waterproofed seams. The Lanshan 1 also uses a coated rainfly, bathtub floor, factory-taped seams, and a waterproof zipper on the current 2026 version. Both require correct pitching and secure staking.
Which is better for beginners?
The Lanshan 1 is more accessible because it costs less and uses one trekking pole. Its factory-taped seams also reduce preparation. The X-Mid 1 may be easier to pitch consistently after practice because of its four-stake geometry. Beginners should practice either tent before using it on a remote trip.
Does Lanshan 1 need seam sealing?
The standard Lanshan 1 uses factory-taped seams, so additional seam sealing is not normally required before use. The Lanshan 1 Pro is different: it is single-wall and requires seam sealing.
Do both tents require trekking poles?
Yes. The Lanshan 1 requires one trekking pole. The X-Mid 1 requires two trekking poles or a compatible dedicated pole system. The support poles are not included in the listed tent minimum weights.